Roof dossierIssue 01

Compare the Evidence, Not Just Roof Age

Decision path

Age can be useful context, but it is not a diagnosis. A sound decision combines safe records, the extent and recurrence of symptoms, roof geometry and evidence about the assemblies below the covering.

01

Start with an urgent-safety boundary

Active electrical hazards, sagging, falling material and severe storm damage need appropriately qualified attention. From a safe location, record when symptoms appeared, where water travelled and what weather preceded them. Begin the roof record with a date and its roof plane or transition; attach the available evidence before making the repair, overlay or replacement decision. The next checkpoint is “Do not walk a wet, steep or damaged roof.” Keep invoices, prior repair notes and insurer correspondence together. Keep that action beside its observation. The roof-scope reviewer can then distinguish the intake roof record from roof closeout record material added during later pricing or investigation.

02

Do not walk a wet, steep or damaged roof

The comparison should address the recurrence and spread of leaks, roof geometry, transition failures and the condition that removal may reveal; otherwise two prices may describe materially different work. A leak beside one penetration after southeast rain does not establish the condition of every plane; its location and recurrence still matter more than a roof-age shortcut. Photograph interior symptoms and exterior elevations from safe ground; then keep invoices, prior repair notes and insurer correspondence together. Label each roof photograph, drawing and prior record by roof plane or transition and date. When a deck, flashing or ventilation question remains, record it in the roof record; identify the roof-scope reviewer review or roof closeout record document that could resolve it. This prevents one leak location from becoming an unsupported conclusion about every plane.

03

Compare local repair with system-wide evidence

A proposal should distinguish a contained defect from repeated failures across several transitions or planes. Ask what is known, what remains concealed and how the conclusion was reached. Describe each plane, transition and roof-space condition separately, citing its supporting roof photograph, measurement or dated document. Record recurring leaks separately from a new, isolated event. A finding at one roof plane or transition may alter the proposed repair, overlay or replacement decision; unobserved parts of the roof system stay outside the available evidence.

04

Map valleys, walls, skylights, vents and low-slope transitions

“Map valleys, walls, skylights, vents and low-slope transitions” belongs on its own line in the roof record. For the roof plane or transition, pair the roof photograph evidence with any concealed or untested roof system limits. Ask whether the deck can be assessed before or during removal. Record recurring leaks separately from a new, isolated event. Cross-reference the roof-system response answer to its roof photograph; include the roof record drawing, a product document for the roof-system response, or a dated reply from the roof-scope reviewer. Arrange deck, flashing or ventilation review before the new covering hides the condition or material orders lock the assembly.

05

Make the decision reversible until evidence is clear

Use a side-by-side worksheet for repair, overlay if proposed, and full replacement. Include expected scope, unresolved risk, disruption and future maintenance without relying on lifespan promises. Before proceeding, retain photos and closeout records for future decisions. Give task ownership to the roof-scope reviewer; place its checkpoint before the repair, overlay or replacement decision, then name the expected roof closeout record. This separates current roof record evidence from the proposed roof-system response. Put manufacturer information and roof-scope reviewer input in the roof closeout record; file authority questions under the relevant roof system decision.

06

List assumptions and exclusions beside each option

Resolve “List assumptions and exclusions beside each option” before ranking proposals. State the baseline roof plane or transition, proposed roof-system response, exclusions, quantities and written change process. Require a change process for hidden deck work. Retain photos and closeout records for future decisions. Review each roof photograph while it can still change the repair, overlay or replacement decision. Record a dated repair, overlay or replacement decision choice or assign the remaining deck, flashing or ventilation question. Track that uncertainty in the roof closeout record, outside the lump-sum total.

07

Complete the decision path record

Finish this decision path as a roof record: include its starting evidence, location map, proposed roof-system response and unresolved limits. For “Compare the Evidence, Not Just Roof Age,” justify each roof-system response inclusion and assign the next deck, flashing or ventilation question. In the roof record, list the approvals, product records and roof closeout record expected. Continue with “Make Every Roof-System Layer Explicit”, “Ask What Happens Beneath the Roof Covering”, and “Normalize Allowances, Exclusions and Closeout” for related roof system decisions. Use the roof record guide links for any wider roof-system response comparison. Keep the dated roof reference beside the decision it informed so a later product or authority update remains visible.

Official references

BC Housing describes roof maintenance, visible warning signs and the limits of resident observation. Use it to organize condition evidence, not to diagnose a Campbell River roof remotely.

BC Housing — Maintaining Your Roof